Token

Dev and editor in chief of memecoinland.com. I am a seasoned memecoin trader and Solana OG. Follow me on twitter for more explicit content. https://x.com/t_ok3n

Avalanche ETF by VanEck Debuts in US Amid AVAX's 55% Year-to-Date Drop

Avalanche ETF by VanEck Debuts in US Amid AVAX’s 55% Year-to-Date Drop

VanEck registers Avalanche ETF in US as AVAX drops 55% year-to-date

Global investment firm VanEck registered an Avalanche exchange-traded fund (ETF) in the United States, hinting at a forthcoming filing for a spot AVAX ETF.

VanEck, on March 10, registered a new cryptocurrency investment product called VanEck Avalanche ETF in Delaware, according to public records on the official Delaware state website.

Similar to other crypto ETF filings by VanEck, the potential new product under filing number 10125689 was registered as a trust corporate service company in Delaware.

VanEck registers Avalanche ETF in US as AVAX drops 55% year-to-date

VanEck Avalanche ETF registration in Delaware. Source: Delaware.gov

The filing comes amid a major market sell-off, with Avalanche (AVAX) dropping 55% year-to-date, while Bitcoin (BTC) is down around 17% in 2025, according to CoinGecko.

Fourth standalone crypto ETF registration by VanEck

With the new filing, Avalanche became the fourth crypto asset to see a standalone ETF registration by VanEck in Delaware, following Bitcoin, Ether (ETH) and Solana (SOL).

As previously reported, VanEck filed for a spot Solana ETF with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in June 2024, becoming one of the first issuers to file for such a product.

VanEck registers Avalanche ETF in US as AVAX drops 55% year-to-date

Source: Nate Geraci

VanEck —  among the first spot Bitcoin ETF issuers in the US in 2024 — has emerged as one of the major ETF players in the crypto market, known for being the first ETF provider to file for a futures Bitcoin ETF in 2017.

VanEck registers Avalanche ETF in US as AVAX drops 55% year-to-date

An excerpt from VanEck’s journey with crypto since 2017. Source: VanEck

What other issuers have filed for an Avalanche ETF in the US?

Launched in 2020 by Emin Gün Sirer’s Ava Labs, Avalanche is a multichain smart contract and decentralized app launch platform that was created to rival the speed and scalability of Ethereum.

Avalanche’s native utility token AVAX made it to the top 10 largest crypto assets by market capitalization in 2021. At the time of writing, the token is the 20th largest crypto asset with a market cap of $7 billion, according to CoinGecko.

Related: Bitwise files to list a spot Aptos ETF — the 36th largest cryptocurrency

Some crypto community members highlighted that VanEck was moving forward with a potential Avalanche ETF before registering an XRP (XRP) ETF.

In an X post reposted by VanEck digital asset research head Matthew Sigel, one commenter wrote:

“VanEck have filed an AVAX ETF before an XRP ETF. Come on then, Matthew Sigel, who is your handler telling you not to file an XRP ETF?”

Delaware, SEC, ETF, Companies, Policy

Source: Matthew Sigel

VanEck’s Avalanche ETF registration appears to be the first registration for the product in the US.

Previously, rival crypto ETF provider Grayscale filed with the SEC to convert its multi-coin fund, including AVAX and four other crypto assets, into an ETF in October 2024.

Magazine: SEC’s U-turn on crypto leaves key questions unanswered

Read More
XRP price prediction: 3 reasons it could fall to $1.60 in March

XRP price prediction: 3 reasons it could fall to $1.60 in March

3 reasons XRP might drop to $1.60 in March

The XRP (XRP) daily chart registered its lowest candle close in 99 days on March 10. The altcoin dropped below the $2 support level but registered a short-term recovery of 12% on March 11.

Ripple, XRP, Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis

XRP 1-hour chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

On the high time frame (HTF) charts, XRP must hold above its psychological level at $2, but other metrics suggest that a deeper drawdown is possible.

XRP markets lack buyers as futures flip bearish

XRP price is currently down 37.1% from its all-time high of $3.40. When prices dipped by a similar percentage on Feb. 3, spot market bids quickly absorbed the selling pressure, pushing XRP above $2.50.

Ripple, XRP, Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis

XRP’s spot and perpetual aggregated data. Source: aggr.trade

However, XRP‘s spot and perpetual markets were relatively bearish over the past week. Data from aggr.trade indicates that XRP’s spot cumulative volume delta (CVD) dropped by 50% in March.

A negative CVD means that there is more selling volume than buying. The current CVD value is -$408 million, which signals waning demand, with sellers taking control.

Likewise, futures traders are also turning bearish, with perpetual CVD dropping to -1.18 billion on March 11. XRP’s open interest-weighted funding rate has also turned significantly negative, which indicates more short positions were added over the past few days.

Ripple, XRP, Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis

XRP funding rate chart. Source: CoinGlass

XRP whales continue selling spree

XRP’s volume bubble map showed a surge in activity toward the end of February. Ki-Young Ju, CryptoQuant founder, observed that this uptick aligned with an ongoing distribution phase for XRP.

Distribution refers to a period in the market cycle when large investors slowly offload their positions to secure gains, usually happening close to the peak of an upward trend.

Related: Why is the XRP price down today?

Current data reveals that the distribution phase has intensified over the past seven days. Specifically, whale outflows, measured as a 30-day moving average, have steadily risen.

This increase suggests that large holders continued to offload their XRP positions, further driving the distribution trend.

Ripple, XRP, Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis

XRP total whale flows. Source: CryptoQuant

Between March 4 and March 10, these large XRP holders offloaded roughly $838 million in positions. This significant sell-off reflects the ongoing bearish trend for XRP.

XRP price H&S pattern hints at $1.60 retest

On March 11, XRP’s 1-day chart closed below $2.05, which is the critical neckline of the daily head-and-shoulders pattern. This pattern has potentially strong bearish consequences when observed on a high time frame (HTF) chart.

Ripple, XRP, Markets, Price Analysis, Market Analysis

XRP 1-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

Lower prices are likely if XRP fails to reclaim $2.05 as support, as illustrated in the chart above.

The immediate target zone for the XRP price remains between 0.5 and 0.618 Fibonacci retracement lines. Also known as the “golden zone,” the retest range lies between $1.90 and $1.60. The likelihood of retesting the 0.618 Fibonacci or $1.60 is high in the current bearish environment.

Failure to hold this range could lead to a retest of the long-term demand zone between $1.58 and $1.27.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Read More
Meteora Co-Founder’s X Account Hacked After Controversial Memecoin Post

Meteora Co-Founder’s X Account Hacked After Controversial Memecoin Post

Meteora says co-founder’s X account hacked after ‘parasitic’ memecoin post

The X account of Meteora co-founder Ben Chow was reported to have been hacked after it posted a tweet reigniting the controversy around the launch of the Libra (LIBRA), Melania Meme (MELANIA) and Official Trump (TRUMP) memecoin tokens that ultimately led to his resignation.

On March 11, Chow’s X account posted an “official statement” about his departure from Meteora. The post called out DefiTuna founders Vlad Pozniakov and Dhirk, claiming the duo’s sole intention was to extract the maximum funds possible from various memecoin token launches, including MELANIA, Mates (MATES) and a Raydium launch.

“As a long time Solana builder, the reason I stepped down is because I am far too trusting for how parasitic the memecoin space is.”

Meteora says co-founder's X account hacked after ‘parasitic' memecoin post

Source: Ben Chow (Deleted post)

The controversial memecoin plot thickens for Meteora 

However, Meteora’s official X account flagged the post as fraudulent, claiming that Chow’s X account was compromised and urged users to refrain from clicking on any links.

Chow did not respond to Cointelegraph’s request for comment. The fraudulent tweet has since been deleted after the account was recovered by Meteora.

Chow’s message contained alleged screenshots of WhatsApp conversations between Kelsier Ventures CEO Hayden Davis, Kelsier Ventures’ chief operating officer Gideon Davis, and Pozniakov discussing the MATES token, where one was quoted saying: “Yeah fellas tbh we are trying to max extract on this one.”

The legitimacy of the conversations could not be verified.

Meteora says co-founder's X account hacked after ‘parasitic' memecoin post

Source: Meteora

Meteora co-founder Zen, who has since taken up the role of CEO, said that Meteora’s X account was also compromised along with Chow’s:

“It’s true that someone gained access momentarily to our Meteora X account. We’ve since reset the account and now verifying.”

Investors were advised against clicking on any links shared from the accounts to avert financial losses.

Related: Milei’s ‘Libragate’ scandal, explained: What’s behind the controversy?

Implications of memecoin speculation in Argentine politics

Argentine President Javier Milei is facing calls for impeachment after endorsing a Solana-native LIBRA token. Milei’s endorsement caused the token’s value to surge from near zero to $5, briefly reaching a $4 billion market capitalization.

However, a massive sell-off event followed that caused LIBRA’s value to drop rapidly, wiping out millions in investor funds in the process.

Milei dismissed rug pull allegations, claiming that he regularly promotes business projects as part of his free-market philosophy. His endorsement of the KIP Protocol, the developers behind LIBRA, was a part of the broader policy.

Magazine: Mystery celeb memecoin scam factory, HK firm dumps Bitcoin: Asia Express

Read More
Yield Farming Explained: Discover the Exciting World of DeFi

Yield Farming Explained: Discover the Exciting World of DeFi

What is yield farming in decentralized finance (DeFi)?

What is yield farming?

Yield farming, also known as liquidity mining, is a decentralized finance (DeFi) strategy where cryptocurrency holders lend or stake their assets in various DeFi protocols to earn rewards. These rewards often come in the form of additional tokens, interest or a share of transaction fees generated by the platform. 

In the yield farming ecosystem, individuals known as liquidity providers (LPs) supply their assets to liquidity pools, smart contracts that facilitate trading, lending or borrowing on DeFi platforms.

By contributing to these pools, LPs enable the smooth operation of decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and lending platforms. In return for their participation, LPs earn rewards, which may include:

  • Transaction fees: A portion of the fees generated from trades or transactions within the pool.
  • Interest payments: Earnings from lending assets to borrowers.
  • Governance tokens: Native tokens of the platform that often grant voting rights on protocol decisions and can appreciate in value.

Key components of yield farming

  • Liquidity pools: These are collections of funds locked in smart contracts that provide liquidity for decentralized trading, lending or other financial services. Users deposit their assets into these pools, enabling various DeFi functions.
  • Automated market makers (AMMs): AMMs are protocols that use algorithms to price assets within liquidity pools, allowing for automated and permissionless trading without the need for a traditional order book.
  • Governance tokens: Tokens distributed to users as rewards for participating in the protocol. These tokens often grant holders the right to vote on changes to the protocol, influencing its future direction.

Yield farming vs. traditional financial yield mechanisms

Yield farming in DeFi differs significantly from traditional financial yield mechanisms:

  • Accessibility: DeFi platforms are typically open to anyone with an internet connection, removing barriers associated with traditional banking systems.
  • Potential returns: While traditional savings accounts offer relatively low interest rates, yield farming can provide substantially higher returns. However, these higher yields come with increased risks, including market volatility and smart contract vulnerabilities.
  • Intermediaries: Traditional finance relies on centralized institutions to manage funds and transactions. In contrast, DeFi operates on decentralized protocols, reducing the need for intermediaries and allowing users to retain control over their assets.

Is yield farming profitable in 2025?

As of February 2025, yield farming remains a profitable strategy, though it is less lucrative than in previous years due to reduced token incentives and heightened competition among liquidity providers. 

That being said, the DeFi sector continues to expand rapidly, with the total value locked (TVL) reaching $129 billion in January 2025, reflecting a 137% year-over-year increase.

Projections suggest that this figure could escalate to over $200 billion by the end of 2025, driven by advancements in liquid staking, decentralized lending and stablecoins.

This growth, fueled by innovations in liquid staking, decentralized lending and stablecoins, is creating new and potentially lucrative yield farming opportunities.

Moreover, the macroeconomic environment plays a crucial role in shaping DeFi yields. In 2024, the US Federal Reserve implemented rate cuts, lowering its policy rate by half a percentage point for the first time in four years. 

This monetary easing has historically increased the attractiveness of DeFi platforms, as lower traditional savings rates drive investors toward alternative high-yield opportunities. As a result, despite overall yield compression, some DeFi platforms still offer double-digit annual percentage yields (APYs), far surpassing traditional financial instruments.

However, note that yield farming isn’t just about earning passive income — it’s a cycle of reinvesting rewards to maximize gains. Farmers earn tokens as rewards and often reinvest them into new liquidity pools, creating a fast-moving loop of capital flow or token velocity. 

This cycle helps DeFi grow by keeping liquidity high, but it also introduces risks. If new users stop adding funds, some farming schemes can collapse like a Ponzi structure, relying more on fresh liquidity than on real value creation.

How does yield farming work?

Embarking on yield farming within the DeFi ecosystem can be a lucrative endeavor. This step-by-step guide will assist you in navigating the process, from selecting a platform to implementing effective risk management strategies.

How does yield farming work

Step 1: Choosing a platform

Selecting the right DeFi platform is crucial for a successful yield farming experience. Established platforms such as Aave, Uniswap and Compound are often recommended due to their reliability and user-friendly interfaces.

Additionally, platforms such as Curve Finance, which specializes in stablecoin trading with low fees and minimal slippage, and PancakeSwap, operating on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC), which offers lower transaction fees and a variety of yield farming opportunities, are also worth considering.

Step 2: Selecting a liquidity pool

When selecting a liquidity pool for yield farming, it’s essential to evaluate the tokens involved, the pool’s historical performance and the platform’s credibility to mitigate risks, such as impermanent loss, which will be discussed later in this article.

Did you know? Annual percentage yield (APY) accounts for compounding interest, reflecting the total amount of interest earned over a year, including interest on interest, while annual percentage rate (APR) denotes the annual return without considering compounding.

Step 3: Staking and farming tokens — How to deposit and withdraw funds

Engaging in yield farming involves depositing (staking) and withdrawing funds:

Depositing funds:

  • Connect your wallet: Use a compatible cryptocurrency wallet (e.g., MetaMask) to connect to the chosen DeFi platform.
  • Select the liquidity pool: Choose the desired pool and review its terms.
  • Approve the transaction: Authorize the platform to access your tokens.
  • Supply liquidity: Deposit the required tokens into the pool.

Withdrawing funds:

  • Navigate to the pool: Access the pool where your funds are staked.
  • Initiate withdrawal: Specify the amount to withdraw and confirm the transaction.
  • Confirm the transaction: Approve the transaction in your wallet to receive your tokens back.

Yield farming on Uniswap

Step 4: Risk management tips

Mitigating risks is essential in yield farming:

  • Stablecoin pools: Participating in pools that involve stablecoins like Tether’s USDt (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) to reduce exposure to market volatility.
  • Diversification: Spread investments across multiple pools and platforms to minimize potential losses.
  • Research and due diligence: Investigate the security measures, audits and reputation of platforms before committing funds.

DeFi yield farming calculator: How to estimate returns

Yield farming calculators estimate returns by factoring in capital supplied, fees earned and token rewards, with several tools aiding projections.

To accurately estimate potential returns in yield farming, calculators require inputs such as the amount of capital supplied to a liquidity pool (liquidity provided), the portion of transaction fees distributed to liquidity providers (fees earned) and any additional incentives or tokens granted by the protocol (token rewards). By inputting these variables, calculators can project potential earnings over a specified period.

Several platforms provide tools to assist in estimating DeFi yields:

  • DefiLlama: Offers comprehensive analytics on various DeFi protocols, including yield farming opportunities.
  • Zapper: Allows users to manage and track their DeFi investments, providing insights into potential returns.
  • Yieldwatch: A dashboard that monitors yield farming and staking, offering real-time data on earnings.
  • CoinGecko’s APY calculator: Breaks down annual percentage yield across different timeframes, helping estimate earnings based on principal and APY percentage.

Yieldwatch offers real-time data on earnings

Did you know? In yield farming, frequent compounding boosts returns. Manual compounding requires reinvesting earnings, while automated compounding reinvests them for you. The more often it happens, the higher your APY.

Understanding impermanent loss in yield farming

Impermanent loss occurs when the value of assets deposited into a liquidity pool changes compared to their value if held outside the pool. 

This phenomenon arises due to price fluctuations between paired assets, leading to a potential shortfall in returns for LPs. The loss is termed “impermanent” because it remains unrealized until the assets are withdrawn; if asset prices revert to their original state, the loss can diminish or disappear.

In AMM protocols, liquidity pools maintain a constant ratio between paired assets. When the price of one asset shifts significantly relative to the other, arbitrage traders exploit these discrepancies, adjusting the pool’s composition. This rebalancing can result in LPs holding a different proportion of assets than initially deposited, potentially leading to impermanent loss.

Consider an LP who deposits 1 Ether (ETH) and 2,000 Dai (DAI) into a liquidity pool, with 1 ETH valued at 2,000 DAI at the time of deposit. If the price of ETH increases to 3,000 DAI, arbitrage activities will adjust the pool’s balance. Upon withdrawing, the LP might receive less ETH and more DAI, and the total value could be less than if the assets were simply held, illustrating impermanent loss.

The impermanent loss formula

For detailed strategies on managing impermanent loss, refer to Step 4 of card 3 in this article.

The future of yield farming

The early days of sky-high, unsustainable returns fueled by inflationary token rewards are fading. Instead, DeFi is evolving toward more sustainable models, integrating AI-driven strategies, regulatory shifts and crosschain innovations.

1. Real yield replaces inflationary rewards

DeFi is moving away from token emissions and toward real yield — rewards are generated from actual platform revenue like trading fees and lending interest. In 2024, this shift was clear: 77% of DeFi yields came from real fee revenue, amounting to over $6 billion. 

2. AI-driven DeFi strategies

AI is becoming a game-changer in yield farming. DeFi protocols now use AI to optimize strategies, assess risks, and execute trades with minimal human input. Smart contracts powered by AI can adjust lending rates in real-time or shift funds between liquidity pools for maximum efficiency. 

3. Regulations

With DeFi’s expansion, regulatory scrutiny is ramping up. Governments are pushing for frameworks to protect investors and prevent illicit activities. While increased oversight might add compliance hurdles, it could also attract institutional players, bringing more liquidity and legitimacy to the space. 

4. Crosschain yield farming

Single-chain ecosystems have limited features. Crosschain yield farming and interoperability solutions are breaking down barriers, allowing users to move assets seamlessly across blockchains. This opens up more farming opportunities and reduces reliance on any single network’s liquidity. 

What’s next?

Several emerging trends are reshaping yield farming. Liquid staking lets users stake assets while still using them in DeFi. Automated vaults simplify farming by dynamically shifting funds for optimized returns. Decentralized index funds offer exposure to multiple assets through a single token, reducing risk while maintaining yield potential.

In short, yield farming is becoming more sophisticated, sustainable and interconnected. The days of easy money are gone, but the opportunities for smart, long-term strategies are only getting better.

Yield farming vs staking: Key differences

The primary distinction between yield farming and staking is that the former necessitates consumers depositing their cryptocurrency cash on DeFi platforms while the latter mandates investors put their money into the blockchain to help validate transactions and blocks.

Yield farming necessitates a well-considered investment strategy. It’s not as simple as staking, but it can result in significantly higher payouts of up to 100%. Staking has a predetermined reward, which is stated as an annual percentage yield. Usually, it is approximately 5%; however, it might be more significant depending on the staking token and technique.

The liquidity pool determines the yield farming rates or rewards, which might alter as the token’s price changes. Validators who assist the blockchain establish consensus and generate new blocks are rewarded with staking incentives.

Yield farming is based on DeFi protocols and smart contracts, which hackers can exploit if the programming is done incorrectly. However, staking tokens have a tight policy that is directly linked to the consensus of the blockchain. Bad actors who try to deceive the system risk losing their money.

Because of the unpredictable pricing of digital assets, yield farmers are susceptible to some risks. When your funds are trapped in a liquidity pool, you will experience an impermanent loss if the token ratio is unequal. In other words, you will suffer an impermanent loss if the price of your token changes when it is in the liquidity pool. When you stake crypto, there is no impermanent loss.

Users are not required to lock up their funds for a set time when using yield farming. However, in staking, users are required to stake their funds for a set period on various blockchain networks. A minimum sum is also required in some cases.

The summary of the differences between yield farming and staking is discussed in the table below:

Yield farming vs. staking

Is yield farming safe?

Every crypto investor should be aware of the risks, including liquidation, control and price risk related to yield farming.

Liquidation risk occurs when the value of your collateral falls below the value of your loan, resulting in a liquidation penalty on your collateral. When the value of your collateral diminishes or the cost of your loan rises, you may face liquidation.

The difficulty with yield farming is that small-fund participants may be at risk because large-fund founders and investors have greater control over the protocol than small-fund investors. In terms of yield farming, the price risk, such as a loan, is a significant barrier. Assume the collateral’s price falls below a certain level. Before the borrower has an opportunity to repay the debt, the platform will liquidate him.

Nevertheless, yield farming is still one of the most risk-free ways to earn free cash. All you have to do now is keep the above mentioned risks in mind and design a strategy to address them. You will be able to better manage your funds if you take a practical approach rather than a wholly optimistic one, making the project worthwhile. If you have a pessimistic view of yield farming, on the other hand, you’ll almost certainly miss out on a rich earning opportunity. 

Read More
DeFi TVL Plummets $45B, Wiping Out Gains Since Trump Era

DeFi TVL Plummets $45B, Wiping Out Gains Since Trump Era

DeFi TVL drops by $45B, erasing gains since Trump election

The total value of cryptocurrencies locked (TVL) in decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols has lost all its gains since Donald Trump was elected US president in November 2024.

Following the US election, DeFi TVL rose to as high as $138 billion on Dec. 17, but had retracted to $92.6 billion by March 10, as noted by analyst Miles Deutscher.

Solana has borne the brunt of criticism as its memecoin popularity fades, but Ethereum has faced its own challenges in recent cycles, with Ether (ETH) failing to reach a new all-time high despite Bitcoin (BTC) soaring past $109,000 on Jan. 20, the day Trump took office. Ethereum’s TVL has also dropped by $30.6 billion from cycle highs, DefiLlama data shows.

Cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin Price, Cryptocurrency Exchange, Decentralized Exchange, Market Analysis, Ether Price

Source: Miles Deutscher

Ether’s record high price of $4,787 from November 2021 remains unbroken despite positive industry developments, such as spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs) launching in the US and Trump’s executive order for a strategic Bitcoin reserve.

Related: Bitcoin risks weekly close below $82K on US BTC reserve disappointment

Ethereum’s $1.8 billion weekly net exchange outflow

Nearly 800,000 ETH, worth approximately $1.8 billion, left exchanges in the week starting March 3, resulting in the highest seven-day net outflow recorded since December 2022, according to IntoTheBlock data.

The outflows are unusual given Ether’s 10% price decline during the period, hitting a low of $2,007, per CoinGecko. Typically, exchange inflows signal selling pressure, while outflows suggest long-term holding or movement into decentralized finance (DeFi) applications, such as staking or yield farming.

“Despite ongoing pessimism around Ether prices, this trend suggests many holders see current levels as a strategic buying opportunity,” IntoTheBlock stated in a March 10 X post.

Before March 3, Ethereum experienced net exchange inflows daily, indicating that investors were selling during the downturn, said Juan Pellicer, senior research analyst at IntoTheBlock, in comments to Cointelegraph. He noted that ETH’s drop to $2,100 may have triggered accumulation, which then led investors to withdraw funds from exchanges.

Pectra upgrade meets own road bumps

Ethereum’s rollup-centric roadmap has reduced congestion and gas fees but introduced liquidity fragmentation.

The upcoming Pectra upgrade aims to address this by enhancing layer-2 efficiency and interoperability. By doubling the number of blobs, it reduces transaction costs and helps consolidate liquidity. Additionally, account abstraction allows smart contract wallets to function more seamlessly across Ethereum and layer-2 networks, simplifying bridging and fund management.

The Pectra upgrade rollout encountered setbacks on March 5 when it launched on the Sepolia testnet. Ethereum developer Marius van der Wijden reported errors on Geth nodes and empty blocks being mined due to a deposit contract triggering an incorrect event type. A fix has been deployed.

Magazine: Pectra hard fork explained — Will it get Ethereum back on track?

Read More
Solana Revenue Plummets 93% After Memecoin Bubble Bursts

Solana Revenue Plummets 93% After Memecoin Bubble Bursts

Solana revenue slumps 93% from January high after memecoin bubble bursts

Solana network revenue and total value locked onchain have collapsed in the past two months as interest in memecoins has continued to taper off. 

Weekly network revenue on the Solana blockchain hit a record high of $55.3 million in mid-January amid the height of the memecoin minting frenzy. 

However, revenue has since tanked 93% to around $4 million in the past week, back to levels not seen since September, according to DefiLlama data. 

Solana weekly decentralized application (DApp) revenue has also slumped around 86% from $238 million in mid-January to $32 million for the past week.  

Meanwhile, DeFi total value locked on Solana has also declined by almost 50% over the same period, falling from a January high of just over $12 billion to current levels of around $6.4 billion. 

Solana revenue slumps 93% from January high after memecoin bubble bursts

Solana weekly revenue and TVL. Source: DefiLlama

Memecoin trading, primarily on the Pump.fun platform comprises roughly 80% of the Solana blockchain’s revenues, according to a March 5 report by VanEck. 

Pump.fun daily revenue hit a peak of $15 million in late January but has since slumped by around 95% to $800,000 on March 7, according to data from Dune Analytics. 

Memecoin mania peaked when Donald Trump launched his own namesake token (TRUMP) on Jan. 18, shortly followed by his wife, Melania, who launched MELANIA on Jan. 20.

“The launch of TRUMP and MELANIA marked the top for memecoins as it sucked liquidity and attention out of all the other cryptocurrencies,” said CoinGecko founder Bobby Ong on March 6. 

Both tokens surged following their launches but dumped in the days that followed. TRUMP is currently down 86% from its peak, trading at $10.50, while MELANIA has collapsed 95% in just seven weeks to $0.71.

Related: Solana down 45% since Trump token launch as memecoins divert liquidity

Memecoin market cap hit a peak of $137 billion in December but has since tanked 68% to $44 billion, according to CoinMarketCap. 

Solana revenue slumps 93% from January high after memecoin bubble bursts

Memecoin market cap meltdown. Source: CoinMarketCap

Solana (SOL) prices have also taken a battering over the past few weeks, resulting in a 58% fall from their mid-January all-time high of $293. The asset was down a further 5% on the day, trading at $122 at the time of writing. 

Magazine: Bitcoin’s odds of June highs, SOL’s $485M outflows, and more: Hodler’s Digest

Read More
Ethereum Surge: $1.8 Billion ETH Withdrawn from Exchanges, Largest Outflow Since 2022

Ethereum Surge: $1.8 Billion ETH Withdrawn from Exchanges, Largest Outflow Since 2022

Ethereum price bottom? $1.8B in ETH leaves exchanges, biggest outflow since 2022

Ethereum’s native token, Ether (ETH), witnessed its lowest weekly close since November 2023, highlighting just how much the top altcoin has struggled over the past few months.

Ethereum price bottom? $1.8B in ETH leaves exchanges, biggest outflow since 2022

Ethereum 1-day chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

In the past 83 days, it declined by 51%, translating to an average daily loss of approximately 0.61%. If the losses are compounded daily, the rate increases to about 0.84%.

Ethereum exchange outflows hit 27-month high

According to IntoTheBlock, a crypto analytics platform, Ethereum witnessed significant outflows worth $1.8 billion over the past week. It was the highest weekly outflow since December 2022, and in an X post, the platform added,

“Despite ongoing pessimism around Ether prices, this trend suggests many holders see current levels as a strategic buying opportunity.”

Ethereum price bottom? $1.8B in ETH leaves exchanges, biggest outflow since 2022

Ethereum net flows on aggregated exchanges. Source: X.com

Fellow onchain data provider CryptoQuant paints a similar picture. The 30-day simple-moving average of Ethereum netflows dropped to roughly 30,000 ETH last week, which was last recorded toward the end of December 2022.

Ethereum price bottom? $1.8B in ETH leaves exchanges, biggest outflow since 2022

Exchange exchange total netflows. Source: CryptoQuant

Likewise, Ethereum’s MVRV (market value to realized value) ratio dropped to 0.8 for the first time since Oct. 18, 2023, as observed in the chart.

Related: Crypto ETPs see 4th straight week of outflows, totaling $876M — CoinShares

The MVRV ratio is a metric that calculates ETH’s market price to the average price at which all ETH in circulation was last moved.

Ethereum price bottom? $1.8B in ETH leaves exchanges, biggest outflow since 2022

Ethereum MVRV ratio. Source: CryptoQuant

An MVRV ratio below 1 indicates undervaluation, signaling a potential buying opportunity. For context, when the MVRV ratio dropped to 0.8 on Oct. 18, 2023, Ether registered a local bottom near $1,600, followed by a bullish reversal and the beginning of the 2024 bull run.

Is the Ethereum bottom in?

Ether price is currently consolidating near its psychological level at $2,000, following a steady correction since the beginning of 2025.

With respect to this intraday price action, Mikybull, a technical analyst, points out that Ethereum is “showing a bullish reversal” with a diamond price pattern.

Markets, Market Analysis, Ether Price

Ethereum 4-hour analysis by Mikybull. Source: X.com

A diamond pattern after a downtrend suggests a potential bullish reversal. Based on this pattern’s measured target, Ether could rebound about 20% to $2,600 from its current price.

Markets, Market Analysis, Ether Price

Ethereum weekly chart. Source: Cointelegraph/TradingView

On the flip side, Ether’s weekly chart closed below the 200-day EMA level for the first time since October 2023. Since 2020, ETH price has remained under this indicator for less than 15% of the time. Previously, Ether rebounded in the following week every time it dropped below this trendline in 2023.

Related: Bitcoin ‘Monte Carlo’ model forecasts $713K peak in 6 months

However, a prolonged period under this line may extend ETH’s bottom price target. Thus, it will be critical for Ethereum to bounce back above this EMA trendline to confirm the bottom over the next few days or weeks.

This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision.

Read More
Crypto Influence Grows: $134M Spent on 2024 US Elections

Crypto Influence Grows: $134M Spent on 2024 US Elections

Crypto firms spent $134M on 2024 US elections, raising influence concerns

Cryptocurrency companies spent more than $134 million on the 2024 US elections, fueling concerns about their growing political influence and potential risks to regulatory stability, according to a report by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA).

The growing connection of crypto firms with US politics is raising newfound concerns for regulators, investors and the wider financial system, according to a report released by the Center for Political Accountability (CPA).

Cryptocurrency firms shelled out a cumulative $134 million on the 2024 US elections in “unchecked political spending,” which presents some critical challenges, the March 7 report stated.

“While the companies making these contributions may be seeking a favorable regulatory environment, these political donations further erode public trust and expose companies to legal, reputational, and business risks that cannot be ignored,” the report added.

Cryptocurrency regulation has taken center stage over the past week following a historic executive order from US President Donald Trump to create a Strategic Bitcoin (BTC) Reserve ahead of the first White House Crypto Summit on March 7.

Crypto firms spent $134M on 2024 US elections, raising influence concerns

Source: politicalaccountability.net

Fairshake, a political action committee (PAC) backed by major crypto firms including Coinbase, Ripple and Andreessen Horowitz, was one of the largest contributors, spending more than $40 million to support candidates aligned with pro-crypto policies.

Fairshake and affiliated PACs were active in key congressional races, attempting to shape legislation favorable to digital assets.

“As the industry continues to seek influence through vast contributions and opaque financial maneuvers, the risks of instability, regulatory backlash, and public distrust only grow,” the report said.

Crypto firms spent $134M on 2024 US elections, raising influence concerns

Fairshake donations. Source: politicalaccountability.net

The influx of crypto money into politics did not go unnoticed by regulators. In August 2024, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission (FEC), alleging that Coinbase’s corporate contributions to Fairshake and the Congressional Leadership Fund constituted a violation of federal election law due to their status as a federal contractor.

Related: Bitcoin reserve backlash signals unrealistic industry expectations

Coinbase has committed an additional $25 million to Fairshake for the 2026 midterm election cycle.

Crypto firms spent $134M on 2024 US elections, raising influence concerns

Coinbase commits $25 million to Fairshake. Source: Coinbase

“The stakes are too high for us to stand on the sidelines, and that’s why we at Coinbase are proud to help do our part,” the company wrote in an October 2024 blog post.

Related: Bitcoin risks deeper drop if $75K support fails amid macro concerns

Crypto’s political donations may be necessary for regulatory clarity

Despite the risks highlighted by the report, some regulatory experts see the donations as necessary for advancing more innovation-friendly regulations.

“As someone deeply involved in crypto, I see this spending as necessary for regulatory clarity, crucial for stability and growth,” according to Anndy Lian, author and intergovernmental blockchain expert:

“It seems likely to boost investor confidence by reducing uncertainty, as seen in pro-crypto candidate wins boosting market sentiment, like bitcoin’s post-election high.”

Still, risks, including “regulatory capture,” where the interests of large firms take priority, may present challenges and erode crypto investor trust. Still, this is part of the organic growth of the emerging crypto industry, Lian said, adding:

“The crypto community’s transparency and decentralization might mitigate this, ensuring fair regulations. While controversial, I don’t find it problematic, viewing it as the industry’s maturation, though public backlash could destabilize politics if seen as buying favor.”

The debate over crypto’s role in politics follows the high-profile collapse of the Libra (LIBRA) token, a memecoin endorsed by Argentine President Javier Milei. The project’s insiders allegedly siphoned over $107 million worth of liquidity in a rug pull, triggering a 94% price collapse within hours and wiping out $4 billion.

Over 100 governmental fraud complaints have been opened in Argentina since the Libra memecoin’s scandal, illustrating the risks of a country’s executive branch promoting “any kind of unregulated security,” the CPA’s report states.

Magazine: Unstablecoins: Depegging, bank runs and other risks loom

Read More